Java's standard java.net.URL class and
    standard handlers for various URL prefixes unfortunately are not quite
    adequate enough for all access to low-level resources. For example,
	there is no standardized URL implementation
	that may be used to access a resource that needs to be obtained from
	the classpath, or relative to a
	ServletContext. While it is possible
    to register new handlers for specialized URL
	prefixes (similar to existing handlers for prefixes such as
	http:), this is generally quite complicated, and the
	URL interface still lacks some desirable
    functionality, such as a method to check for the existence of the
	resource being pointed to.
Spring's Resource interface is meant
    to be a more capable interface for abstracting access to low-level
    resources.
public interface Resource extends InputStreamSource { boolean exists(); boolean isOpen(); URL getURL() throws IOException; File getFile() throws IOException; Resource createRelative(String relativePath) throws IOException; String getFilename(); String getDescription(); }
public interface InputStreamSource { InputStream getInputStream() throws IOException; }
Some of the most important methods from the
    Resource interface are:
getInputStream(): locates and opens the
        resource, returning an InputStream for reading
        from the resource. It is expected that each invocation returns a
        fresh InputStream. It is the responsibility of
        the caller to close the stream.
exists(): returns a
        boolean indicating whether this resource actually
        exists in physical form.
isOpen(): returns a
        boolean indicating whether this resource represents
        a handle with an open stream. If true, the
        InputStream cannot be read multiple times, and
        must be read once only and then closed to avoid resource leaks. Will
        be false for all usual resource implementations,
        with the exception of
        InputStreamResource.
getDescription(): returns a description
        for this resource, to be used for error output when working with the
        resource. This is often the fully qualified file name or the actual
        URL of the resource.
Other methods allow you to obtain an actual
    URL or File object
    representing the resource (if the underlying implementation is compatible,
    and supports that functionality).
The Resource abstraction is used
    extensively in Spring itself, as an argument type in many method
    signatures when a resource is needed. Other methods in some Spring APIs
    (such as the constructors to various
    ApplicationContext implementations), take a
    String which in unadorned or simple form is used to
    create a Resource appropriate to that
    context implementation, or via special prefixes on the
    String path, allow the caller to specify that a
    specific Resource implementation must be
    created and used.
While the Resource interface is used
    a lot with Spring and by Spring, it's actually very useful to use as a
    general utility class by itself in your own code, for access to resources,
    even when your code doesn't know or care about any other parts of Spring.
    While this couples your code to Spring, it really only couples it to this
    small set of utility classes, which are serving as a more capable
    replacement for URL, and can be considered
    equivalent to any other library you would use for this purpose.
It is important to note that the
    Resource abstraction does not replace
    functionality: it wraps it where possible. For example, a
    UrlResource wraps a URL, and uses the wrapped
    URL to do its work.
There are a number of Resource
    implementations that come supplied straight out of the box in
    Spring:
The UrlResource wraps a
      java.net.URL, and may be used to access any
      object that is normally accessible via a URL, such as files, an HTTP
      target, an FTP target, etc. All URLs have a standardized
      String representation, such that appropriate
      standardized prefixes are used to indicate one URL type from another.
      This includes file: for accessing filesystem paths,
      http: for accessing resources via the HTTP protocol,
      ftp: for accessing resources via FTP, etc.
A UrlResource is created by Java code
      explicitly using the UrlResource constructor, but
      will often be created implicitly when you call an API method which takes
      a String argument which is meant to represent a
      path. For the latter case, a JavaBeans
      PropertyEditor will ultimately decide
      which type of Resource to create. If the
      path string contains a few well-known (to it, that is) prefixes such as
      classpath:, it will create an appropriate specialized
      Resource for that prefix. However, if it
      doesn't recognize the prefix, it will assume the this is just a standard
      URL string, and will create a UrlResource.
This class represents a resource which should be obtained from the classpath. This uses either the thread context class loader, a given class loader, or a given class for loading resources.
This Resource implementation
      supports resolution as java.io.File if the class
      path resource resides in the file system, but not for classpath
      resources which reside in a jar and have not been expanded (by the
      servlet engine, or whatever the environment is) to the filesystem. To
      address this the various Resource
      implementations always support resolution as a
      java.net.URL.
A ClassPathResource is created by Java code
      explicitly using the ClassPathResource
      constructor, but will often be created implicitly when you call an API
      method which takes a String argument which is
      meant to represent a path. For the latter case, a JavaBeans
      PropertyEditor will recognize the special
      prefix classpath:on the string path, and create a
      ClassPathResource in that case.
This is a Resource implementation
      for java.io.File handles. It obviously supports
      resolution as a File, and as a
      URL.
This is a Resource implementation
      for ServletContext resources,
      interpreting relative paths within the relevant web application's root
      directory.
This always supports stream access and URL access, but only allows
      java.io.File access when the web application
      archive is expanded and the resource is physically on the filesystem.
      Whether or not it's expanded and on the filesystem like this, or
      accessed directly from the JAR or somewhere else like a DB (it's
      conceivable) is actually dependent on the Servlet container.
A Resource implementation for a
      given InputStream. This should only be
      used if no specific Resource
      implementation is applicable. In particular, prefer
      ByteArrayResource or any of the file-based
      Resource implementations where
      possible.
In contrast to other Resource
      implementations, this is a descriptor for an
      already opened resource - therefore returning
      true from isOpen(). Do not
      use it if you need to keep the resource descriptor somewhere, or if you
      need to read a stream multiple times.
The ResourceLoader interface is meant
    to be implemented by objects that can return (i.e. load)
    Resource instances.
public interface ResourceLoader { Resource getResource(String location); }
All application contexts implement the
    ResourceLoader interface, and therefore all
    application contexts may be used to obtain
    Resource instances.
When you call getResource() on a specific
    application context, and the location path specified doesn't have a
    specific prefix, you will get back a
    Resource type that is appropriate to that
    particular application context. For example, assume the following snippet
    of code was executed against a
    ClassPathXmlApplicationContext instance:
Resource template = ctx.getResource("some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt");What would be returned would be a
    ClassPathResource; if the same method was executed
    against a FileSystemXmlApplicationContext instance,
    you'd get back a FileSystemResource. For a
    WebApplicationContext, you'd get back a
    ServletContextResource, and so on.
As such, you can load resources in a fashion appropriate to the particular application context.
On the other hand, you may also force
    ClassPathResource to be used, regardless of the
    application context type, by specifying the special
    classpath: prefix:
Resource template = ctx.getResource("classpath:some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt");Similarly, one can force a UrlResource to be
    used by specifying any of the standard java.net.URL
    prefixes:
Resource template = ctx.getResource("file:/some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt");Resource template = ctx.getResource("http://myhost.com/resource/path/myTemplate.txt");The following table summarizes the strategy for converting
    Strings to
    Resources:
Table 4.1. Resource strings
| Prefix | Example | Explanation | 
|---|---|---|
| classpath: |   | Loaded from the classpath. | 
| file: |   |  Loaded as a  | 
| http: |   | Loaded as a
             | 
| (none) |   |  Depends on the underlying
             | 
| [1] But see also Section 4.7.3, “FileSystemResource caveats”. | ||
The ResourceLoaderAware interface is
    a special marker interface, identifying objects that expect to be provided
    with a ResourceLoader reference.
public interface ResourceLoaderAware { void setResourceLoader(ResourceLoader resourceLoader); }
When a class implements
    ResourceLoaderAware and is deployed into an
    application context (as a Spring-managed bean), it is recognized as
    ResourceLoaderAware by the application
    context. The application context will then invoke the
    setResourceLoader(ResourceLoader), supplying
    itself as the argument (remember, all application contexts in Spring
    implement the ResourceLoader
    interface).
Of course, since an
    ApplicationContext is a
    ResourceLoader, the bean could also
    implement the ApplicationContextAware
    interface and use the supplied application context directly to load
    resources, but in general, it's better to use the specialized
    ResourceLoader interface if that's all
    that's needed. The code would just be coupled to the resource loading
    interface, which can be considered a utility interface, and not the whole
    Spring ApplicationContext interface.
As of Spring 2.5, you can rely upon autowiring of the
    ResourceLoader as an alternative to
    implementing the ResourceLoaderAware interface.
    The "traditional" constructor and byType
    autowiring modes (as described in Section 3.4.5, “Autowiring collaborators”)
    are now capable of providing a dependency of type
    ResourceLoader for either a
    constructor argument or setter method parameter respectively. For more flexibility
    (including the ability to autowire fields and multiple parameter methods), consider
    using the new annotation-based autowiring features. In that case, the
    ResourceLoader will be autowired into a field,
    constructor argument, or method parameter that is expecting the
    ResourceLoader type as long as the field,
    constructor, or method in question carries the
    @Autowired annotation. For more information,
    see Section 3.9.2, “@Autowired and @Inject”.
If the bean itself is going to determine and supply the resource
    path through some sort of dynamic process, it probably makes sense for the
    bean to use the ResourceLoader interface to
    load resources. Consider as an example the loading of a template of some
    sort, where the specific resource that is needed depends on the role of
    the user. If the resources are static, it makes sense to eliminate the use
    of the ResourceLoader interface completely,
    and just have the bean expose the Resource
    properties it needs, and expect that they will be injected into it.
What makes it trivial to then inject these properties, is that all
    application contexts register and use a special JavaBeans
    PropertyEditor which can convert
    String paths to
    Resource objects. So if
    myBean has a template property of type
    Resource, it can be configured with a
    simple string for that resource, as follows:
<bean id="myBean" class="..."> <property name="template" value="some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt"/> </bean>
Note that the resource path has no prefix, so because the
    application context itself is going to be used as the
    ResourceLoader, the resource itself will be
    loaded via a ClassPathResource,
    FileSystemResource, or
    ServletContextResource (as appropriate)
    depending on the exact type of the context.
If there is a need to force a specific
    Resource type to be used, then a prefix may
    be used. The following two examples show how to force a
    ClassPathResource and a
    UrlResource (the latter being used to access a
    filesystem file).
<property name="template" value="classpath:some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt">
<property name="template" value="file:/some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt"/>
An application context constructor (for a specific application context type) generally takes a string or array of strings as the location path(s) of the resource(s) such as XML files that make up the definition of the context.
When such a location path doesn't have a prefix, the specific
      Resource type built from that path and
      used to load the bean definitions, depends on and is appropriate to the
      specific application context. For example, if you create a
      ClassPathXmlApplicationContext as follows:
ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("conf/appContext.xml");
The bean definitions will be loaded from the classpath, as a
      ClassPathResource will be
      used. But if you create a
      FileSystemXmlApplicationContext as
      follows:
ApplicationContext ctx =
    new FileSystemXmlApplicationContext("conf/appContext.xml");The bean definition will be loaded from a filesystem location, in this case relative to the current working directory.
Note that the use of the special classpath prefix or a standard
      URL prefix on the location path will override the default type of
      Resource created to load the definition.
      So this FileSystemXmlApplicationContext...
ApplicationContext ctx =
    new FileSystemXmlApplicationContext("classpath:conf/appContext.xml");... will actually load its bean definitions from the classpath.
      However, it is still a FileSystemXmlApplicationContext. If it is
      subsequently used as a ResourceLoader,
      any unprefixed paths will still be treated as filesystem paths.
The ClassPathXmlApplicationContext
        exposes a number of constructors to enable convenient instantiation.
        The basic idea is that one supplies merely a string array containing
        just the filenames of the XML files themselves (without the leading
        path information), and one also supplies a
        Class; the
        ClassPathXmlApplicationContext will derive the
        path information from the supplied class.
An example will hopefully make this clear. Consider a directory layout that looks like this:
com/
  foo/
    services.xml
    daos.xml
    MessengerService.classA ClassPathXmlApplicationContext instance
        composed of the beans defined in the 'services.xml'
        and 'daos.xml' could be instantiated like
        so...
ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext( new String[] {"services.xml", "daos.xml"}, MessengerService.class);
Please do consult the Javadocs for the
        ClassPathXmlApplicationContext class for
        details of the various constructors.
The resource paths in application context constructor values may
      be a simple path (as shown above) which has a one-to-one mapping to a
      target Resource, or alternately may contain the special "classpath*:"
      prefix and/or internal Ant-style regular expressions (matched using
      Spring's PathMatcher utility). Both of the latter
      are effectively wildcards
One use for this mechanism is when doing component-style
      application assembly. All components can 'publish' context definition
      fragments to a well-known location path, and when the final application
      context is created using the same path prefixed via
      classpath*:, all component fragments will be picked
      up automatically.
Note that this wildcarding is specific to use of resource paths in
      application context constructors (or when using the
      PathMatcher utility class hierarchy directly),
      and is resolved at construction time. It has nothing to do with the
      Resource type itself. It's not possible
      to use the classpath*: prefix to construct an actual
      Resource, as a resource points to just
      one resource at a time.
When the path location contains an Ant-style pattern, for example:
     /WEB-INF/*-context.xml
     com/mycompany/**/applicationContext.xml
     file:C:/some/path/*-context.xml
     classpath:com/mycompany/**/applicationContext.xml... the resolver follows a more complex but defined procedure to
        try to resolve the wildcard. It produces a Resource for the path up to
        the last non-wildcard segment and obtains a URL from it. If this URL
        is not a "jar:" URL or container-specific variant (e.g.
        "zip:" in WebLogic, "wsjar" in
        WebSphere, etc.), then a java.io.File is
        obtained from it and used to resolve the wildcard by traversing the
        filesystem. In the case of a jar URL, the resolver either gets a
        java.net.JarURLConnection from it or manually
        parses the jar URL and then traverses the contents of the jar file
        to resolve the wildcards.
If the specified path is already a file URL (either
          explicitly, or implicitly because the base
		  ResourceLoader is a
          filesystem one, then wildcarding is guaranteed to work in a
          completely portable fashion.
If the specified path is a classpath location, then the
          resolver must obtain the last non-wildcard path segment URL via a
          Classloader.getResource() call. Since this
          is just a node of the path (not the file at the end) it is actually
          undefined (in the ClassLoader Javadocs)
          exactly what sort of a URL is returned in this case. In practice, it
          is always a java.io.File representing the
          directory, where the classpath resource resolves to a filesystem
          location, or a jar URL of some sort, where the classpath resource
          resolves to a jar location. Still, there is a portability concern on
          this operation.
If a jar URL is obtained for the last non-wildcard segment,
          the resolver must be able to get a
          java.net.JarURLConnection from it, or
          manually parse the jar URL, to be able to walk the contents of the
          jar, and resolve the wildcard. This will work in most environments,
          but will fail in others, and it is strongly recommended that the
          wildcard resolution of resources coming from jars be thoroughly
          tested in your specific environment before you rely on it.
When constructing an XML-based application context, a location
        string may use the special classpath*:
        prefix:
ApplicationContext ctx =
    new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("classpath*:conf/appContext.xml");This special prefix specifies that all classpath resources that
        match the given name must be obtained (internally, this essentially
        happens via a ClassLoader.getResources(...)
        call), and then merged to form the final application context
        definition.
| ![[Note]](images/note.gif) | Classpath*: portability | 
|---|---|
| The wildcard classpath relies on the  | 
The "classpath*:" prefix can also be combined
        with a PathMatcher pattern in the rest of the location path, for
        example "classpath*:META-INF/*-beans.xml". In this
        case, the resolution strategy is fairly simple: a
        ClassLoader.getResources() call is used on the last non-wildcard path
        segment to get all the matching resources in the class loader
        hierarchy, and then off each resource the same PathMatcher resoltion
        strategy described above is used for the wildcard subpath.
Please note that "classpath*:" when
        combined with Ant-style patterns will only work reliably with at least
        one root directory before the pattern starts, unless the actual target
        files reside in the file system. This means that a pattern like
        "classpath*:*.xml" will not retrieve files from the
        root of jar files but rather only from the root of expanded
        directories. This originates from a limitation in the JDK's
        ClassLoader.getResources() method which only
        returns file system locations for a passed-in empty string (indicating
        potential roots to search).
Ant-style patterns with "classpath:"
		resources are not guaranteed to find matching resources if the root
		package to search is available in multiple class path locations. This
		is because a resource such as
com/mycompany/package1/service-context.xml
may be in only one location, but when a path such as
classpath:com/mycompany/**/service-context.xml
is used to try to resolve it, the resolver will work off the (first) URL
        returned by getResource("com/mycompany");. If
        this base package node exists in multiple classloader locations, the
        actual end resource may not be underneath. Therefore, preferably, use
        "classpath*:" with the same Ant-style pattern in
        such a case, which will search all class path locations that contain
        the root package.
A FileSystemResource that is not attached
      to a FileSystemApplicationContext (that is, a
      FileSystemApplicationContext is not the actual
      ResourceLoader) will treat absolute vs.
      relative paths as you would expect. Relative paths are relative to the
      current working directory, while absolute paths are relative to the root
      of the filesystem.
For backwards compatibility (historical) reasons however, this
      changes when the FileSystemApplicationContext is
      the ResourceLoader. The
      FileSystemApplicationContext simply forces all
      attached FileSystemResource instances to treat
      all location paths as relative, whether they start with a leading slash
      or not. In practice, this means the following are equivalent:
ApplicationContext ctx =
    new FileSystemXmlApplicationContext("conf/context.xml");ApplicationContext ctx =
    new FileSystemXmlApplicationContext("/conf/context.xml");As are the following: (Even though it would make sense for them to be different, as one case is relative and the other absolute.)
FileSystemXmlApplicationContext ctx = ...;
ctx.getResource("some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt");FileSystemXmlApplicationContext ctx = ...;
ctx.getResource("/some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt");In practice, if true absolute filesystem paths are needed, it is
      better to forgo the use of absolute paths with
      FileSystemResource /
      FileSystemXmlApplicationContext, and just force
      the use of a UrlResource, by using the
      file: URL prefix.
// actual context type doesn't matter, the Resource will always be UrlResource ctx.getResource("file:/some/resource/path/myTemplate.txt");
// force this FileSystemXmlApplicationContext to load its definition via a UrlResource ApplicationContext ctx = new FileSystemXmlApplicationContext("file:/conf/context.xml");